Re: SEX (fwd)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Karl Strickland: "Re: SEX (fwd)"
• Previous message: Silicon Avatar: "Re: IRC Security Loophole"
• Maybe in reply to: Karl Strickland: "SEX (fwd)"

Tim.Herman@GSA.GOV asks

> I just signed up w/this bugtraq service about a week ago.  Can
> someone tell me if this is the type of garbage that is typically
> sent?  [referring to "WITH SEX ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE"]

No.  It's a somewhat amusing parody of a well-known net plague...but it
was, and is, completely off-topic for bugtraq.  Mercifully, bugtraq has
so far been pretty free of such thoroughly off-topic stuff.

scott@spy.org (Scott D. Yelich) replies:

>> I just signed up w/this bugtraq service about a week ago.  Can
>> someone tell me if this is the type of garbage that is typically
>> sent?
> bugtraq has been garbage for about the last 8 months.  It's now
> almost totally worthless.

I disagree, for what that's worth.

					der Mouse

			    mouse@collatz.mcrcim.mcgill.edu

• Next message: Karl Strickland: "Re: SEX (fwd)"
• Previous message: Silicon Avatar: "Re: IRC Security Loophole"
• Maybe in reply to: Karl Strickland: "SEX (fwd)"